Live news: US Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade | Women News

  • US Supreme Court docket overturns landmark Roe v Wade resolution, upending almost 5 a long time of abortion entry within the nation.
  • In 6-3 vote, conservative-dominated high courtroom guidelines the US Structure “doesn’t confer a proper to abortion”.Reproductive rights advocates say thousands and thousands of individuals will now not have entry to abortion companies within the US.
  • American Civil Liberties Union says ruling is “a gender, racial and financial justice disaster with lethal penalties”.

Listed below are all the most recent updates:

Choice ‘particularly harmful’ for spiritual minorities: Muslim Advocates

Muslim Advocates, a civil rights organisation within the US, has raised alarm over the Supreme Court docket’s resolution, saying it “is particularly harmful to these belonging to minority religions like Islam”.

“How far down this path the courtroom will go just isn’t sure, however the rise of anti-Muslim authorities acts just like the Muslim Ban and state adoption of anti-sharia laws has proven that Muslims are particularly focused by these moved by paranoia and misrepresentation,” the group mentioned.

“When that paranoia is mixed with state energy, the outcomes will be devastating to the civil and human rights of all Muslims on this nation.”


Of their phrases: US Supreme Court docket justices’ information on abortion

Supreme Court docket justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts, the courtroom’s chief justice, voted in favour of Friday’s resolution.

The justices have had so much to say about abortion through the years.

See a sampling of their feedback right here.


US legal professional basic says Justice Division disagrees with resolution

US Legal professional Normal Merrick Garland has mentioned the Justice Division “strongly disagrees” with the Supreme Court docket’s ruling.

“This resolution offers a devastating blow to reproductive freedom in the US,” Garland mentioned in a press release, stressing nonetheless that the choice “doesn’t get rid of the flexibility of states to maintain abortion authorized inside their borders”.

“We acknowledge that touring to acquire reproductive care is probably not possible in lots of circumstances. However underneath bedrock constitutional rules, ladies who reside in states which have banned entry to complete reproductive care should stay free to hunt that care in states the place it’s authorized. Furthermore, underneath elementary First Modification rules, people should stay free to tell and counsel one another concerning the reproductive care that’s accessible in different states,” he mentioned.

map


Poor, marginalised will likely be most affected: Progressive Democrats


What occurs when ladies are denied entry to abortion?

When Ann walked into her physician’s workplace six years in the past, she anticipated to schedule an abortion. As a substitute, the faculty graduate in her early 20s discovered she was between 23 and 25 weeks pregnant. With California’s cutoff set at about six months, she was turned away.

“I used to be instructed flat-out that there was no different possibility,” Ann, whose title has been modified for privateness causes, instructed Al Jazeera. “I bear in mind crying, gasping. It was such life-changing information that I used to be not anticipating to get.”

With out entry to the abortion she wished, she carried the being pregnant to time period. At eight months, she developed extreme eclampsia, skilled seizures, and almost died. “The place we’re going as a rustic with abortion entry,” she mentioned, “there’s going to be extra folks like me.”

Learn extra right here.


Twenty-six US states ‘sure or doubtless’ to ban abortion: Guttmacher

Twenty-six US states are “sure or doubtless” to ban abortion now that Roe has been overturned, the Guttmacher Institute reproductive rights group has mentioned.

“With out Roe, 26 states are sure or prone to ban abortion to the fullest extent potential, together with 13 states which have ‘set off’ legal guidelines in place that can mechanically enact bans—some inside days and even hours of as we speak’s resolution,” Herminia Palacio, the group’s president and CEO, mentioned in a press release.

“Many years of analysis persistently present that abortion bans and restrictions don’t cut back unintended being pregnant or demand for abortion, they usually definitely don’t assist folks enhance their well being.”


‘Disaster’: Rights teams slam high courtroom resolution

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and different rights teams have slammed the choice, saying thousands and thousands of individuals will now not have entry to abortion within the US.

“At the moment’s resolution is a gender, racial and financial justice disaster with lethal penalties. Ladies and individuals who can turn into pregnant have been compelled right into a second-class standing,” the ACLU mentioned on Twitter.

“At the moment marks a grim milestone within the historical past of the US,” Tarah Demant at Amnesty Worldwide USA additionally mentioned in a press release. “Thousands and thousands of people that can turn into pregnant in the US now face a future the place they will be unable to make deeply private decisions that have an effect on their our bodies, their future, and the well-being of their households.”


‘Radical Supreme Court docket’ endangering Individuals’ rights: Pelosi

US Home of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi has condemned the choice by the Supreme Court docket, saying the well being and security of individuals within the US was in danger.

“This morning, the unconventional Supreme Court docket is eviscerating Individuals’ rights and endangering their well being and security. However Congress will proceed to behave to beat this extremism and defend the American folks,” Pelosi instructed reporters.

“At the moment the Republican-controlled Supreme Court docket has achieved their darkish, excessive purpose of ripping away ladies’s proper to make their very own reproductive well being selections.”


Anti-abortion activists have fun outdoors high courtroom in Washington, DC

Anti-abortion activists have gathered to have fun the Supreme Court docket’s resolution to overturn Roe v Wade. The crowds erupted in cheers as information of the ruling unfold.

“I’m ecstatic,” mentioned Emma Craig, 36, of Professional Life San Francisco.

“Abortion is the most important tragedy of our era and in 50 years we’ll look again on the 50 years we’ve been underneath Roe v Wade with disgrace.”

Roe
A celebration outdoors the Supreme Court docket, June 24, 2022 [Steve Helber/AP Photo]

US Supreme Court docket overturns Roe v Wade

The US Supreme Court docket has overturned Roe v Wade, the landmark ruling that granted the appropriate to abortion for almost 5 a long time in the US.

In a call launched on Friday, the nation’s high courtroom dominated in a Mississippi case that “the Structure doesn’t confer a proper to abortion”. The justices voted 6-3, powered by the courtroom’s conservative supermajority.

Learn the complete resolution right here (PDF).


Hiya and welcome to Al Jazeera’s reside protection of the US Supreme Court docket’s resolution to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v Wade abortion ruling.

Maine cannot ban aid to religious schools, top US court rules | Courts News

The six-to-three ruling is the most recent in a sequence of Supreme Court docket choices lately increasing non secular rights.

The US Supreme Court docket has allowed extra public funding of non secular entities, ruling in favour of two Christian households who challenged a Maine tuition help programme that excluded personal colleges that promote faith.

In a six-to-three resolution the justices overturned on Tuesday a decrease court docket ruling that had rejected the households’ claims of non secular discrimination in violation of the US Structure, together with the First Modification safety of the free train of faith.

It was the most recent in a sequence of selections lately increasing non secular rights.

The court docket’s conservative justices had been within the majority within the ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, with its liberal members in dissent.

The choice builds upon the Supreme Court docket’s 2020 ruling in a case from Montana that paved the best way for extra taxpayer {dollars} to circulation to non secular colleges.

Maine supplies public funds to pay for tuition at personal excessive colleges of a household’s selection in some sparsely populated areas of the northeastern state that lack public secondary colleges.

The colleges receiving this tuition help below the programme have to be “nonsectarian” and are excluded in the event that they promote a selected faith and current materials “by way of the lens of that religion”.

The ruling provided the most recent instance of the Supreme Court docket, with its more and more assertive conservative majority, making the enlargement of increasing non secular liberty a excessive precedence. The justices have been receptive to claims made by plaintiffs – typically conservative Christians – of presidency hostility in the direction of faith together with within the academic context.

The Maine case – titled Carson v Makin – examined two completely different provisions of the First Modification: a clause that prohibits the federal government from establishing a faith and one other that ensures the free train of faith.

“Maine has chosen to supply tuition help that oldsters could direct to the general public or personal colleges of their selection,” Roberts wrote.

“Maine’s administration of that profit is topic to the free train ideas governing any public profit program – together with the prohibition on denying the profit based mostly on a recipient’s non secular train.”

For her half, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that in a dissenting opinion that the highest court docket has “for a lot of many years understood the Institution Clause to ban authorities from funding non secular train”.

“Lastly, the Court docket’s resolution is particularly perverse as a result of the profit at challenge is the general public training to which all of Maine’s youngsters are entitled below the State Structure,” Sotomayor wrote.

“As this Court docket has lengthy acknowledged, the Institution Clause requires that public training be secular and impartial as to faith.”

In a separate dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer – who’s retiring on the finish of the court docket’s present time period – stated Maine was nicely inside its proper to withhold funding from colleges that promote faith.

“Maine has promised all youngsters throughout the State the suitable to obtain a free public training. In fulfilling this promise, Maine endeavors to offer youngsters the religiously impartial training required in public faculty programs,” Breyer wrote.

“And that, in important half, displays the State’s anti-establishment pursuits in avoiding spending public cash to help what is actually non secular exercise. The Faith Clauses give Maine the power, and suppleness, to make this selection.”

Israeli court questions ban on Jewish prayer at Al-Aqsa compound | Israel-Palestine conflict News

Court docket overturns a police order barring three Jews from holy web site after they prayed there in violation of the established order.

A decrease Israeli court docket has overturned a police order barring three Jews from the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound after they prayed there in violation of understandings with Muslim authorities, questioning the authorized foundation of such enforcement.

The Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, positioned in occupied East Jerusalem’s Previous Metropolis and housing Islam’s third-holiest web site, is known as al-Haram al-Sharif, or the Noble Sanctuary, by Muslims. In response to an settlement in place since 1967, non-Muslims are allowed onto the positioning throughout visiting hours, however they’re barred from praying there.

Jews imagine the 35-acre compound is the place the Biblical Jewish temples as soon as stood.

Israel permits Jews to go to on situation they chorus from spiritual rites. However the growing variety of such visits, together with over the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan that coincided this 12 months with the Jewish Passover pageant, has stoked the fears of Palestinians, who see this as Israeli makes an attempt to alter the holy web site’s delicate establishment.

‘A grave assault’

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas issued a press release calling Sunday’s ruling “a grave assault towards the historic establishment … and a flagrant problem to worldwide legislation”.

The Jerusalem Justice of the Peace’s Court docket dominated in favour of three appellants who had been banned from the Previous Metropolis for 15 days for prostrating themselves and intoning a core Jewish prayer on the compound. The ruling quoted police as saying these actions disrupted its officers’ duties and threatened public order.

Eradicating the ban, Choose Zion Saharai stated that whereas he had no intention of interfering in legislation enforcement on the web site, “the appellants’ conduct doesn’t elevate fear of hurt befalling nationwide safety, public security or particular person safety”.

Police had no remark. Eran Schwarz, a lawyer whose agency represented the appellants, stated he anticipated police to contest the ruling. Justice of the Peace’s courts could be overturned by district courts, with Israel’s Supreme Court docket a remaining course of enchantment.

The ruling got here every week earlier than far-right Israelis are resulting from maintain an annual flag march via the Previous Metropolis, marking its seize by Israel within the 1967 Center East warfare. Israel later annexed occupied East Jerusalem, a transfer not recognised by a lot of the worldwide group. The occasion is resented by Palestinians, who need the Previous Metropolis and different elements of occupied East Jerusalem because the capital of their hoped-for future state.

Hamas, a Palestinian group that fought a Gaza warfare with Israel final 12 months that was partly stoked by tensions in occupied East Jerusalem, described the flag march’s deliberate route via a Muslim quarter of the Previous Metropolis as “including gas to the hearth”.

“I warn the enemy towards finishing up such crimes,” Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh stated in a televised handle.

Jordan, a United States-backed Israeli safety associate that serves as custodian of Al-Aqsa, has additionally voiced concern in regards to the Jewish visits to the compound.