On Roe anniversary, US VP says no freedom without abortion rights | Women’s Rights News

Vice President Kamala Harris has warned that abortion rights are underneath assault throughout the US in a speech to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Roe v Wade ruling.

Harris mentioned the now-defunct Supreme Court docket ruling, which codified federal abortion protections however was struck down by conservative justices final yr, had enshrined the “basic constitutional proper of a lady to make choices of her personal physique, not the federal government”.

“America is the land of the free and the house of the courageous. However allow us to ask: Can we actually be free if a lady can’t make choices about her personal physique?” the vp mentioned on Sunday from Tallahassee, Florida.

“Can we actually be free if a physician can’t take care of her sufferers? Can we actually be free if households can’t make intimate choices in regards to the course of their very own lives?”

Previous to the speech, the White Home introduced its newest efforts to shore up help for abortion rights, saying it was “in session” with the Workplace of the Legal professional Normal and the Division of Homeland Safety “to contemplate new steering to help sufferers, suppliers, and pharmacies who want to legally entry, prescribe, or present” abortion treatment and to contemplate new methods to “be certain that sufferers can entry authorized reproductive care”.

The Meals and Drug Administration additionally introduced this month that so-called abortion tablets would change into extra extensively obtainable at pharmacies and thru the mail.

Nonetheless, the administration of US President Joe Biden has been comparatively restricted in its capability to reply to the overturning of Roe v Wade with out the passage of federal laws. Such an effort is all however certain to fail amid opposition from Republicans, who management the Home of Representatives and who final yr launched a invoice that bans abortions nationwide at 15 weeks from conception, with few exceptions.

“Because the Supreme Court docket’s choice, Individuals, time and time once more, have made their voices heard: Ladies ought to be capable of make these deeply private choices free from political interference,” Biden mentioned in a press release on Sunday.

“But, Republicans in Congress and throughout the nation proceed to push for a nationwide abortion ban, to criminalise medical doctors and nurses, and to make contraception more durable to entry. It’s harmful, excessive, and out of contact.”

In the meantime, the Ladies’s March motion, which shaped within the wake of the election victory of former President Donald Trump, referred to as for a so-called “Greater than Roe” nationwide mobilisation on Sunday, with a flagship march deliberate in Madison, Wisconsin, and different gatherings deliberate in cities throughout the nation.

The mobilisation comes after anti-abortion advocates held their annual “March for Life” rally on Friday in Washington, DC, with organisers hailing the overturning of Roe v Wade and calling for additional restrictions on abortion.

New face of abortion rights

The repeal of Roe v Wade has introduced the struggle over abortion entry to state legislatures and courts.

Some states have moved to shore up protections via new legal guidelines or poll measures, with voters in California, Michigan, and Vermont shifting to enshrine abortion rights of their state constitutions in the course of the 2022 midterm elections.

Others have enacted sweeping restrictions on abortion, with the Guttmacher Institute figuring out 12 states as of Sunday the place abortion is banned besides in uncommon exceptions.

Different restrictions have been held up on account of court docket challenges, with an evaluation by the Kaiser Household Basis figuring out lively litigation towards abortion restrictions in 14 states. About half of US states at the moment have some type of abortion bans in place.

Chatting with reporters on Friday, White Home Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre mentioned that Harris could be talking in Florida as a result of it’s emblematic of battles taking part in out throughout the nation.

Florida at the moment has a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of conception, a interval earlier than many ladies know they’re pregnant. Nevertheless, its restrictions are much less stringent than these of its neighbouring states, making it an necessary useful resource for ladies within the area.

Nonetheless, abortion rights advocates concern extra restrictions might be thought-about by the Republican-controlled state legislature and Republican Governor Ron DeSantis.

The governor is predicted to hunt the Republican nomination within the 2024 presidential election, a race the place abortion rights are all however assured to loom giant.

“So we’re preventing again,” Harris mentioned on Sunday. “The appropriate of each girl in each state on this nation to make choices about her physique is on the road. I’ve mentioned it earlier than and I’ll say it once more: How dare they.”

Nigerian government rejects report on military abortion programme | Women’s Rights News

Nigeria’s authorities denounced a Reuters report of a mass clandestine abortion scheme as a ‘physique of insults’ towards Nigerians.

The Nigerian authorities has rejected a Reuters information company report revealed final week a few secret programme of compelled abortions run by the navy within the nation’s northeast, Info Minister Lai Mohammed stated.

The Reuters investigation reported that since 2013, a secret navy programme has concerned terminating no less than 10,000 pregnancies amongst girls and women, lots of whom had been kidnapped and raped by members of the Boko Haram group.

The sources included dozens of witness accounts and documentation reviewed by Reuters.

“The Federal Authorities hereby categorically states that there is no such thing as a ‘secret, systematic and unlawful abortion programme’ being run by our navy within the northeast or wherever throughout the nation,” Mohammed stated in opening remarks at a public occasion in Abuja on Monday.

“We additionally hereby reject the accusation of working an abortion programme levelled at our navy,” he stated.

Mohammed’s feedback have been the primary by a Nigerian authorities official for the reason that report was revealed final week.

The navy has additionally denied finishing up abortions, and denounced the report as “a physique of insults on the Nigerian peoples and tradition”.

“Nigerian navy personnel have been raised, bred and additional educated to guard lives,” it stated.

“[The] Nigerian navy won’t, subsequently, ponder such evil of working a scientific and unlawful abortion programme wherever and anytime, and certainly not on our personal soil.”

The report was primarily based on witness accounts from 33 girls and women, 5 well being staff and 9 safety personnel concerned within the alleged programme, and on navy paperwork and hospital data “describing or tallying hundreds of abortion procedures”.

In line with Reuters, many of the abortions have been carried out with out the lady’s consent and a few have been carried out with out their prior information, by way of abortion-inducing capsules or injections handed off as medicines to spice up well being or fight illness.

United Nations Secretary-Common Antonio Guterres on Friday known as on Nigerian authorities to analyze the allegations, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric stated.

Mohammed didn’t say whether or not there could be such an investigation by authorities.

Nigeria’s defence chief has stated the navy won’t examine the Reuters report, saying it was not true.

US ‘troubled’ by killing of youngsters

Individually, the US Division of State says it’s “deeply troubled” by a Reuters report that the Nigerian military killed kids in its combat towards armed fighters.

Nigerian navy leaders informed Reuters the military has by no means focused kids for killing. They stated the reporting within the article by Reuters is an insult to Nigerians and a part of a international effort to undermine the nation’s combat towards the fighters.

“We’re pursuing additional data, together with from the Authorities of Nigeria and stakeholders working on this house,” a US State Division spokesperson stated by electronic mail.

“We’re nonetheless reviewing the report and can make choices about subsequent steps thereafter. Our Embassy in Abuja is in search of extra data, together with by talking to Nigerian authorities.”

The Reuters report stated intentional killings of youngsters have occurred throughout northeast Nigeria, the place the navy has been battling armed fighters for 13 years.

Sex slaves, forced labour: Why S Korea, Japan ties remain tense | Women’s Rights News

Strain is rising on Japan and South Korea to resolve their historic feuds, with Seoul’s high courtroom set to look at a case that might see the property of some Japanese companies bought off to compensate Korean wartime labourers.

The case is considered one of dozens that South Koreans have lodged towards Japan, which colonised the Korean peninsula from 1910 – 1945, in search of reparations for compelled labour and sexual slavery in Japanese army brothels throughout World Struggle II.

The South Korean Supreme Court docket, in a collection of landmark rulings in 2018, has already ordered Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Nippon Metal to compensate some 14 former staff for his or her brutal remedy and unpaid labour.

A lot of them at the moment are of their 90s, and several other have died for the reason that rulings with out seeing any compensation.

“I can not cross away earlier than receiving an apology from Japan,” one of many former labourers, Yang Geum-deok, wrote in a current letter to the South Korean authorities. The 93 12 months previous, who was despatched to work at a Mitsubishi plane manufacturing unit in 1944, when she was 14, stated the Japanese firm “must apologise and switch over the cash”.

However each Mitsubishi Heavy and Nippon Metal have refused to adjust to the rulings, with the Japanese authorities insisting the problem has been settled in previous bilateral agreements.

Lee Choon-shik, a victim of wartime forced labor during the Japanese colonial period, holds a banner that reads "Apologize for forced labour and fulfill the compensation" during an anti-Japan protest on Liberation Day in Seoul, South Korea, August 15, 2019.
Lee Choon-shik, a sufferer of wartime compelled labour throughout the Japanese colonial interval, holds a banner that reads ‘Apologise for compelled labour and fulfil the compensation’ throughout an anti-Japan protest on Liberation Day in Seoul, South Korea, on August 15, 2019 [File: Kim Hong-Ji/ Reuters]
Students hold portraits of deceased former South Korean "comfort women" during a weekly anti-Japan rally in Seoul, South Korea, August 15, 2018.
College students maintain portraits of deceased former South Korean intercourse slaves throughout an anti-Japan rally in Seoul, South Korea, on August 15, 2018 [File: Kim Hong-Ji/ Reuters]

The South Korean Supreme Court docket is now set to deliberate on a decrease courtroom ruling that ordered the liquidation of a few of Mitusbishi Heavy Industries’ property, and consultants are urging Seoul and Tokyo to succeed in a decision earlier than a verdict is introduced.

They are saying the long-running feuds may threaten safety cooperation between the 2 neighbours at a time when North Korea has warned of preemptive nuclear strikes and launched an unprecedented variety of missiles and weapons checks. The stakes are excessive for america, too. For Washington, which has army bases and troops in each international locations, the feuds undermine its efforts to construct an Indo-Pacific alliance to counter China’s rising international affect.

Japan and South Korea have “received to avert the upcoming Sword of Damocles,” stated Daniel Sneider, lecturer in East Asian Research at Stanford College within the US. “If the courtroom strikes forward to grab the property of Japanese corporations, then every little thing breaks down,” he stated, with probably “tragic” penalties for international commerce, in addition to the US’s skill to defend its two allies within the occasion of a North Korean assault.

As calls develop for a settlement, right here’s a have a look at the historical past behind the bitter feuds and why they appear so intractable.

‘Consolation girls’

Japan and Korea share a protracted historical past of rivalry and conflict. The Japanese have repeatedly tried to invade the Korean peninsula, and succeeded in annexing and colonising it in 1910. Throughout World Struggle II, Japanese authorities compelled tens of 1000’s of Koreans to work in factories and mines and despatched girls and women into army brothels. A United Nations professional, in a 1996 report, stated some 200,000 Korean “consolation girls” have been compelled right into a system of “army sexual slavery” and known as the abuses “crimes towards humanity”.

After Japan’s rule of Korea led to 1945, the peninsula was cut up alongside the thirty eighth parallel, with rival governments taking energy in Pyongyang and Seoul. The US, which backed the federal government in Seoul, lobbied it for higher relations with Tokyo. And after 14 years of secretive negotiations, South Korea and Japan in 1965 signed a treaty normalising relations. Underneath that deal, Japan agreed to supply South Korea with $500m in grants and loans and any points regarding property, rights and pursuits of the 2 international locations and their peoples have been thought-about to “have been settled fully and eventually”.

However the settlement set off mass protests in South Korea, with the opposition and scholar demonstrators accusing then-President Park Chung-hee of “promoting away the nation” for a “paltry sum”. The federal government imposed martial regulation to quash the nationwide demonstrations and went on to make use of the Japanese funds to kick-start South Korea’s growth, together with by constructing highways and a metal manufacturing unit.

Grievances over the problem of compelled labour and sexual slavery continued to fester, nonetheless.

Within the early 90s, South Korean victims of compelled labour, together with Yang Geum-deok, filed for compensation in Japanese courts whereas survivors of the army brothels went public with accounts of their abuses. The Japanese courts threw out the Korean compelled labour petitions, however in 1993, the Japanese chief cupboard secretary, Yohei Kono, publicly supplied “honest apologies and regret” for the army’s involvement within the compelled recruitment of Korean girls for intercourse.

Two years later, Japanese Prime Minister Tomiichi Marayama acknowledged the struggling brought on by Japan’s “colonial rule and aggression” and made a “profound apology to all those that, as wartime consolation girls, suffered emotional and bodily wounds that may by no means be closed”. He additionally established a fund from non-public contributions to compensate victims in South Korea and different Asian international locations.

Japan’s apologies

However many in South Korea didn’t contemplate Japan’s regret as honest, and tensions flared once more when former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who was first elected in 2006, claimed there was no proof to recommend Japan coerced Korean girls into sexual slavery. Throughout Abe’s second stint as prime minister, his authorities stated the ladies shouldn’t be known as “intercourse slaves” and stated figures equivalent to 200,000 consolation girls lacked “concrete proof”.

The claims angered South Koreans, however nonetheless, amid issues over North Korea’s rising nuclear arsenal, the federal government of then-President Park Geun-hye – the daughter of former President Park Chung-hee – signed a brand new take care of Tokyo, agreeing to “lastly and irreversibly” resolve the “consolation girls” challenge in return for a renewed apology and a 1 billion yen (now $6.9m) fund to assist the victims. On the time, 46 of the 239 girls who had registered with the South Korean authorities have been nonetheless alive in South Korea, and 34 of them acquired compensation.

Others condemned the deal, nonetheless, saying it had ignored their calls for that Japan take obligation for the atrocities and supply official reparations.

Park was later impeached and jailed for corruption, and her successor, Moon Jae-in, dismantled the fund in 2018.

It was that very same 12 months that the South Korean Supreme Court docket ordered Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Nippon Metal to compensate Korean wartime labourers.

Japan responded furiously, calling the rulings “completely unacceptable” and eradicating South Korea’s favoured commerce accomplice standing and imposing export controls on chemical compounds important to the Korean semiconductor business. It additionally warned of “critical” ramifications ought to the Japanese corporations’ property be seized. Moon’s authorities, in the meantime, additionally downgraded Japan’s commerce standing and practically scrapped a army intelligence pact, whereas South Koreans launched a boycott of Japanese items, together with the beer model, Asahi, and the clothes firm, Uniqlo.

The disaster was the worst for the reason that two international locations normalised ties.

The current change in South Korea’s presidency, from Moon to Yoon Suk-yeol, has raised hopes of a thaw.

Two days after his election victory in March, Yoon spoke to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in regards to the want for the 2 nations to work collectively. Yoon promised to advertise “pleasant relations” whereas Kishida stated ties between the 2 international locations are “indispensable” at a time when the world was “confronted with epoch-making adjustments”.

‘Ball is in Korea’s courtroom’

However regardless of the nice and cozy rhetoric, makes an attempt to rearrange a gathering between the 2 leaders have but to bear fruit. Yoon invited Kishida to his inauguration, however the Japanese overseas minister attended. Equally, an try at arranging a gathering throughout US President Joe Biden’s go to to Asia in Might and a NATO assembly in June additionally failed.

“Japanese politicians suppose the ball is in Korea’s courtroom and need to see how Yoon will deal with the compelled labour challenge,” stated Jeffrey Kingston, professor of historical past and Asian research on the Temple College in Japan.

“The prevailing view is scepticism about overcoming historical past controversies and a sense that Korea performs the historical past card to badger and humiliate Japan for colonial-era misdeeds. This feeds right into a sanctimonious nationalism and condescending views in the direction of Korea amongst Japanese conservatives. Mainly, the prices of unhealthy relation­s with Korea usually are not seen to be very excessive and never price making concessions,” he stated.

In a bid to discover a method ahead, Yoon in June convened a gaggle of victims, consultants and officers to advise the federal government on the compelled labour challenge. The group has mentioned a number of options, in accordance with native media reviews, together with establishing a joint fund managed by two governments utilizing voluntary contributions from South Korean and Japanese corporations to compensate the compelled labour victims.

However a number of victims are towards the thought.

“If it have been in regards to the cash, I’d have given up by now,” Yang Geum-deok wrote in her letter, stressing that she would “by no means settle for” the cash if “different folks give it to me”.

Victims of sexual slavery, in the meantime, are interesting for a United Nations judgement on the problem.

Lee Yong-soo, who was dragged from her residence at 16 and despatched to a brothel in Japanese-occupied Taiwan, instructed the Related Press information company in March: “Each South Korea and Japan maintain ready for us to die, however I’ll struggle till the very finish.” She instructed the company that her marketing campaign for intervention from the UN’s Worldwide Court docket of Justice is geared toward pressuring Japan to completely settle for accountability and acknowledge its previous army sexual slavery as conflict crimes.

Given the sturdy South Korean sentiment, Choi Eunmi, analysis fellow on the Asan Institute for Coverage Research, stated it’s needed for the federal government in Seoul to generate higher social consensus on the significance of in search of higher ties with Japan.

“It’s their process to influence and let peculiar Korean folks know why Japan is essential globally and why the Korea-Japan relations mustn’t solely be targeted on the previous issues,” she stated. On the identical time, Japan additionally must do way more, she stated. “Japan can’t simply wait and see what the Korean aspect says,” she stated, urging Tokyo to increase an “olive department” to assist flip public sentiment in South Korea, together with by lifting among the sanctions and restrictions on commerce and tourism between the 2 international locations.

Sneider of Stanford additionally stated he wished the “Japanese felt a higher sense of urgency about bettering relations with Korea”. He stated “actual clear stress” from the US was important to get Japan to reciprocate the Korean need to enhance relations.

“As a result of in Tokyo, they don’t care practically as a lot about what Koreans suppose as they do about what People suppose. That may be a actuality,” he stated.

US: Kansas votes to protect abortion access in Roe v Wade test | Women’s Rights News

Kansas voters have rejected an effort to take away abortion protections from the state’s structure, a powerful win for the abortion rights motion within the first statewide electoral take a look at since the US Supreme Courtroom overturned Roe v Wade in June.

The modification’s failure within the conservative state on Tuesday lifted Democrats’ hopes that the problem of abortion rights will energise voters in November’s midterm elections whilst they fear about surging inflation.

The consequence additionally will forestall Kansas’s Republican-led legislature from passing extreme abortion restrictions within the state, which has turn out to be a key abortion entry level for the US heartland.

Political analysts had anticipated the Kansas modification to go, provided that Republicans usually end up in larger numbers for the state’s major elections than Democrats and independents.

However Tuesday’s vote drew the next than anticipated turnout. With 98 p.c of the vote counted, 59 p.c of voters favoured preserving abortion rights in contrast with practically 41 p.c who supported eradicating abortion protections from the state structure, in line with Edison Analysis.

US President Joe Biden joined Democrats throughout the nation in applauding the outcomes on Tuesday.

“This vote makes clear what we all know: Nearly all of People agree that girls ought to have entry to abortion and may have the proper to make their very own well being care choices,” Biden mentioned in a press release.

Kansas Republicans had been pushing for a state constitutional modification to eradicate abortion rights since 2019, when the Kansas Supreme Courtroom dominated the state structure protected the proper to abortion.

“Kansans bluntly rejected anti-abortion politicians’ makes an attempt at making a reproductive police state,” mentioned Kimberly Inez McGuire, govt director of Unite for Reproductive & Gender Fairness.

”In the present day’s vote was a strong rebuke and a promise of the mounting resistance.”

Kansas’s poll initiative is the primary of a number of that can ask US voters to weigh in on abortion rights this yr. Kentucky, California, Vermont and presumably Michigan could have abortion on the poll this fall.

The profitable “vote no” marketing campaign in Kansas might provide a blueprint to abortion rights teams trying to harness voter power within the wake of Roe’s reversal, Allen mentioned.

“This needs to be an actual wake-up name for abortion opponents,” Neal Allen, a political science professor at Wichita State College, advised Reuters information company.

“When a complete ban seems to be like a risk, you then’re going to get lots of people to end up and also you’re going to lose quite a lot of the extra average supporters of abortion restrictions.”

On account of the ruling, Kansas has maintained extra lenient insurance policies than different conservative neighbours. The state permits abortion as much as 22 weeks of being pregnant with a number of restrictions, together with a compulsory 24-hour ready interval and obligatory parental consent for minors.

Sufferers journey to Kansas for abortions from Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri and different states which have banned the process virtually totally because the Supreme Courtroom in June overturned Roe, the 1973 resolution that legalised abortion nationwide.

Tuesday’s referendum drew nationwide consideration and cash. The Worth Them Each Affiliation, which supported the modification, raised about $4.7m this yr, about two-thirds of that from regional Catholic dioceses, in line with marketing campaign finance information.

Kansans for Constitutional Freedom, the principle coalition opposing the modification, raised about $6.5m, together with greater than $1m from Deliberate Parenthood teams.

Susan B Anthony Professional-Life America, a nationwide anti-abortion group, mentioned it spent $1.4 million to advertise the modification and canvassed 250,000 properties in Kansas.

“Tonight’s loss is a big disappointment for pro-life Kansans and People nationwide,” mentioned Mallory Carroll, a spokesperson for the group. “The stakes for the pro-life motion within the upcoming midterm elections couldn’t be larger.”